Archive

Posts Tagged ‘market’

John Hussman: No, The Markets Aren’t Excessively Bearish

September 6th, 2010 Comments off

A key tenet of the bull argument of late has been that the market is now excessively bearish.
John Hussman disagrees:
An important part of last week’s advance appeared to be a simple “clearing” of the a short-term oversold condition in prices and bearish sentiment. While the recent increase in bearish sentiment might have deserved something of a “clearing rally,” it is notable that we’re observing what might be called bearishness without nervousness. The chart below presents the Investors Intelligence bearish percentage versus the CBOE volatility index (VIX), which is often viewed as a “fear gauge” for the stock market. Historically, increases in the level of bearishness early in a market downturn are often both accurate and persistent, as we observed all through 2008 and in many past market cycles. It’s difficult to look at the evidence and conclude that investors are excessively bearish, much less terrified here.
Join the conversation about this story »

Microsoft
Millicom Intl. Cellular
Mobile Telesystems
Nanya Technology
Nii Holdings

Housing helped by tax credit in Lafayette, Ind.; future unclear

September 6th, 2010 Comments off

Lafayette, Ind.’s metro area housing market is ending the summer on a flat note. The home buyer tax credit stimulated home sales before it ended, …

Alliance Data Systems
Alltel
Amazon.Com
America Movil
Amkor Technology

Finally, People Are Calling For A REAL Housing-Market Fix: Letting Prices Fall

September 6th, 2010 Comments off

For the past few years (and, in reality, for decades before that), the government has tried to improve the nation’s housing market by artificially inflating house prices.
The mortgage-mod programs, the back-door bank bailouts, the Fed-subsidized mortgage rates, the $150 billion flushed down the Fannie and Freddie rat-hole–all these tactics and more have been designed to reduce monthly payments for mortgage holders and keep house prices high.
And while these policies are obviously appealing to anyone who owns a house, they also shaft everyone who doesn’t.
Importantly, these policies also shaft anyone who wants to buy a house.
* And anyone who has responsibly accumulated savings that are currently earning nothing thanks to the government’s zero-interest-rate policies.
* And anyone who might like to invest savings in something that might earn something–like fairly priced housing. 
* And even anyone who bought more house than they can afford but are hanging on to it in the hope that the government will sucessfully bail them out–instead of cutting their losses and moving on with their lives.
But three years into the bailouts, people are finally throwing up their hands. As the administration tries to figure out what to do to save the Democrats in November, calls for a new form of housing action are emerging: STOP trying to keep house prices artificially high and just let prices fall.  (See this article by David Streitfeld in the New York Times.)
In other words, stop screwing the majority of the country that didn’t borrow huge amounts of money from 2005-2007 to buy houses it couldn’t afford, and just let the market heal itself.
How would the government do this?
Any number of ways.
By letting mortgage prices and loan requirements rise to normal levels. By trimming the Fannie/Freddie subsidies. By figuring out a simple mechanism whereby banks can reduce principal on mortgages in exchange for equity interests in the houses. By squelching all talk of future housing tax credits. Etc.
And what would this do?
Well, in the short-term, if house prices fell to fair value (5% to 10% below today’s level–see chart below), it would certainly lead to more folks walking away from their mortgages. It would also, thereby, lead to more bank writeoffs.  But that’s only fair. And the banks now have enough capital (and enough access to capital), so they’ll be able to survive.
Importantly, it would also allow a new generation of home buyers to step into the market and buy with the confidence that they won’t get screwed if the government ever does decide to stop pumping up prices. (This is a big and justifiable fear.)  Instead, new buyers will be able to look at long-term price-to-income and price-to-rent ratios and observe that they are buying houses at fair value or below–instead of at levels that are still artificially inflated relative to almost all non-bubble history.
It would allow renters who have heretofore been priced out of the market to buy for the first time. 
It would force banks to clean up their balance sheets faster.
It would encourage consumers to clean up their own balance sheets faster.
It would restore sales velocity to the housing market, which would help the vast communities of real-estate related industries get back on their feet–thus helping reduce unemployment.
It would restore the government’s firepower, allowing for modest, temporary intervention if it ever became desirable down the road (instead of prolonging the flooring-it-just-to-stay-steady current situation).
In short, in exchange for a modest amount of short-term pain for some banks and a minority of Americans (those underwater on their mortgages), it would help the country’s housing market heal itself faster. And, in so doing, it would help the majority of the country, by helping our economy more quickly get back on its feet again.
Here’s a larger version of Robert Shiller’s long-term house price chart. Note that prices (blue line) are still modestly above the long-term average:

See Also: Let’s Be Honest About Fannie And Freddie: They Now Exist To Keep House Prices HighJoin the conversation about this story »See Also:Can We Please Be Honest About Fannie And Freddie? They Now Exist To Make Houses More ExpensiveThe New York Times Starts Banging The Drum For Stimulus Via Fannie And Freddie

Novellus Systems
Novell
Network Appliance
Netgear
Ncr

Let the Bush tax cuts expire

August 18th, 2010 Comments off

One of the great misconceptions in this country is that what happens in Washington determines what happens in financial markets. It’s so simple, convenient, and satisfying to attribute market movements to the President, the Federal Reserve, Congress, the tax code, or some combination of them. It sure makes for great sound bites and slogans — but often makes for inaccurate analysis.

Total System Services
Tns
Tibco Software
Tibco Software
Thq

Can’t find a job? National Park Service is hiring

August 17th, 2010 Comments off

There is at least one bright spot amid this otherwise wretched job market: The National Park Service is hiring!

Level 3 Communications
Lawson Software
Land Software
Lam Research
L-1 Identity Solutions

Get A Trading Referee And Improve Your Performance

August 11th, 2010 Comments off

A trading referee can greatly improve your outlook (and success) in the market.

Nii Holdings
Nikon
Nintendo
Nokia
Nvidia

Get A Trading Referee And Improve Your Performance

August 11th, 2010 Comments off

A trading referee can greatly improve your outlook (and success) in the market.

Diodes Inorated
Diebold
Dell
Cypress Semiconductor
Accenture

Get A Trading Referee And Improve Your Performance

August 11th, 2010 Comments off

A trading referee can greatly improve your outlook (and success) in the market.

Rogers Communications
Saic
Satyam Computer Services
Ses
Shaw Communications

Hot spot in secondary market

August 10th, 2010 Comments off

Each day in Paris, Antoine Dréan dines on roasted salmon at his table at power-lunch enclave Hôtel Costes. He’s earned his seat there by running Triago, one of the hottest firms in one of the hottest fields in private equity: helping pension funds and endowments sell their unwanted positions on the secondary market.Emc
Fidelity National Information Svcs.
Fiserv
Google
Grupo Iusacell

Job market continues to sputter

August 8th, 2010 Comments off

For the second month in a row, the U.S. economy shed jobs as the government continued to unload census workers, offsetting disappointing gains in private business hiring.Qualcomm
Quanta Computer
Research In Motion
Rogers Communications
Saic

How do you lose money in the Forex market?

August 2nd, 2010 Comments off

How do you lose money in the Forex market?

August 2nd, 2010 Comments off

Why Must The Media Keep Trotting Out Greenspan And His Economic Lunacy?

August 2nd, 2010 Comments off

…and we continue to talk ourselves off the edge of the cliff. For the second week in a row Meet The Press trotted out the most financially incompetent of the financially incompetent and placed them on their undeserving pedestal. 
Last week it was Tim Geithner, the veritable fox in the hen house of the financial crisis.  This week it was Alan Greenspan, one of the grand orchestrator’s of our financial industry’s deregulation and the most vocal advocate of the virus that is neoliberalism. 
This man has poisoned our economy for almost 5 decades (and he has admitted that his models were “flawed”) yet we continue to worship at the altar of Greenspan….It’s worse than the John Meriwether’s of the world who continually reopen hedge funds after driving the last one into the ground.  What in the world is wrong with Wall Street and our financial system?  Are we really so incompetent as a whole that we find it is okay to consistently reward and rely on those who have consistently failed us?  Pardon my frustration, but this is beyond madness.  Why do these people command such obedience?
This week, Mr. Greenspan was once again out discussing monetary policy despite the fact that he has already admitted his models were flawed.  20 years of mistakes and yet we still hang on his every word.  Mr. Greenspan is still latching onto this insane idea that bond yields are going to spike as soon as the bond vigilantes awake from their slumber:

MR. GREENSPAN:  Well, the problem there implies that the government has control over those rates, meaning the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department, in a sense.  There is no doubt that the federal funds rate, that is the rate produced by the Federal Reserve, can be fixed at whatever the Fed wants it to be, but which the government has no control over is long-term interest rates, and long-term interest rates are what make the economy move. And if this budget problem eventually merges to the point where it begins to become very toxic, it will be reflected in rising long-term interest rates, rising mortgage rates, lower housing.  At the moment, there is no sign of that, basically because the financial system is broke and you cannot have inflation if financial system is not working.

First of all, as the issuer of bonds denominated in their own currency, the US government can offer interest bearing debt instruments at whatever maturity and interest rate it pleases.  As I’ve explained before, the bond market serves no fiscal purpose – it funds nothing.  It is purely a monetary tool for the Fed to drain reserves and maintain control of interest rates.   This actually renders the issuance of long-term bonds fairly meaningless.  The reserve drain could be done with a CD, however, the government chooses to issue longer dated notes as well as short duration notes.  If the government wanted to stop issuing 10 year notes they easily could (they did so with the 30 year and nothing happened to the bond market).  Mr. Greenspan clearly thinks the bond market funds our spending and that this raises a solvency issue in the USA.  His model is “”flawed” (not my words!).
He continued the interview by discussing the need for fiscal prudence and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts (an effective tax hike):

MR. GREENSPAN:  Look, I’m very much in favor of tax cuts, but not with borrowed money.  And the problem that we’ve gotten into in recent years is spending programs with borrowed money, tax cuts with borrowed money, and at the end of the day, that proves disastrous.  And my view is I don’t think we can play subtle policy here on it.

This is more madness from a man who has been terribly wrong about everything for the majority of his career.  The bond market is not “borrowed money”.  Will China really stop buying our bonds?  Will Japan stop buying our bonds?  And if they do, who cares?  It’s their loss.  They can leave pieces of paper with old dead white men on them sitting in their bank vaults earning 0%.  The Fed will continue to find buyers of government bonds in the USA (because the reserves created via government spending are ALWAYS there to be drained because the government effectively put them there!).
How many more times does Mr. Greenspan have to be wrong before we stop listening to this fear mongering?  Mr. Greenspan wants to raise taxes and cut the deficit because he incorrectly believes the bond vigilantes are taking a nap.  I am all for fiscal prudence (via efficient and effective government spending), but tax hikes serve very little purpose in this time of private sector de-leveraging.  It will only exacerbate our debt problems at the private sector level and certainly will not make us more solvent at the government level.  Greenspan has the gold standard on his mind and it has resulted in a massively flawed model for most of his career.  The gold standard is dead, it is not coming back and we need to stop allowing these archaic thought processes to influence government policy.
————————-
This guest post previously appeared at The Pragmatic Capitalist >Join the conversation about this story »

Intersections
International Rectifier
International Game Technology
International Business Machines (ibm)
Interdigital Communications

What can $1 million buy in today’s housing market?

July 31st, 2010 Comments off

How much can $1 million buy you in today’s real estate market? The answer, of course, varies depending on where you’re looking to buy.

Viewsonic
Verisign
Verifone Holdings
Veeco Instruments
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates

3 Great Companies Raising Dividends (GE, WFD, VNR, XLF, DIA)

July 31st, 2010 Comments off

When dividends are raised in the midst of a market correction, it’s especially comforting.

Digital China Holdings
Directv Group
Elpida Memory
Emc
Fidelity National Information Svcs.

Bulls Make Big Comeback On Final Day Of The Month: Here’s What You Need To Know (SPY)

July 30th, 2010 Comments off

It was an oddly news-filled, but quiet session in the market today. In the end, despite having been down most of the day, stocks ended up.
But first, the scoreboard:
Dow: +2.42NASDAQ: +3S&P 500: +0.68
And now, the top stories:

World markets were mostly subdued overnight, perhaps in part due to a weak industrial production number out of Japan, and also because of carryover from yesterday’s emotional day in the US.

James Bullard’s ‘we are Japan’ paper continued to garner a lot of talk this morning, culminating with 2 hours on CNBC this morning, where he expressed displeasure with the prospect of ending the Bush tax cuts.

The big action in the US started at 8:30. GDP came in on the weak side of what was expected — not horrible, but stocks sold off instantly on the news. On the other hand, Chicago PMI and University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment both came in better than expected.

But the market action was decidedly down beat (though again, not wildly so) for most of the day. In addition to equities, notable winners (and this should obviously concern the bulls) were Treasuries and the yen.
Join the conversation about this story »

Dst Systems
Discover Financial Services
Diodes Inorated
Diebold
Dell

Apartment occupancy up amid foreclosures

July 28th, 2010 Comments off

Landlords are seeing a surge in apartment rentals amid mounting foreclosures and an improving job market for young adults.

Research In Motion
Rogers Communications
Saic
Satyam Computer Services
Ses

The world isn’t flat. But the market is.

July 27th, 2010 Comments off

What do pancakes, tapeworms, old soda and the stock market have in common? They’re all flat.Scientific Games
Sandisk
Salesforce Com
Saic
Rockwell Automation

How do you lose money in the Forex market?

July 27th, 2010 Comments off

Tips For Creating Profitable Stock Charts

July 24th, 2010 Comments off

Find out how to create well-designed charts that will enhance your market analysis.

Progress Software
Planar Systems
Perot Systems
Palm
Osi Systems